Dylan Biggs D. As far as I know, I believe Genesis to be history. At any point in history. I guess this does count as the Bronze age. Correct if I'm wrong. But since he would likely be using tools around at that time. I'm struggling on HOW he could do such a thing. This is so even if some post-Flood civilizations used only bronze, perhaps because after the Babel dispersion they lost the technology of iron smelting.
One wonders if it is valid anywhere. See also Computers on the Ark? Mark H. AU July 27th, Great work. I especially like the calculation of the size of the Ark train carriages.
311 Startup Failure Post-Mortems
I'll remember that. See also the response to Richard L. Hans G. The teaching has to go on more and more as the people think less and less. At least they read those articles—why? John P. AU July 26th, A great article; interesting how a bunch of bibliosceptics tried to worm out of the fact of a historical global flood where Noah and his family and the land-breathing animals, mainly juveniles, were saved on the ark.
Sea-dwelling animals would have survived in the water, of course. As always, Jonathan provided spot on biblical answers which were irrefutable. God bless. Martin D. AU December 7th, The Bible also describes in great detail how the Earth is a flat, geocentric platform. Jonathan Sarfati December 7th, That boring old canard? Long ago refuted, e. Mark S. GB November 27th, MS: Thank you for taking the trouble to answer my many questions. The main article was one of my first articles in Creation magazine. These are not words of conviction, but purely of supposition and blind-faith.
But these are biblically and scientifically reasonable solutions, based on known low-tech animal husbandry methods and known features of animals. The onus is on the biblioskeptics or their compromising churchian allies to demonstrate that no solution is possible. Neither you nor anyone else has come even close to that, and you fired your best shots over two emails. MS: your replies have been purely guesswork and referal to the work of others which also contain many words of doubt. JS: Very educated guesswork, as amply shown. MS: As you are always able to refer to your God as being able to do anything He wishes, JS: Note that this was only in reply to your pseudo-theological arguments.
JS: As above, not in my arguments, but only when you brought up God yourself. So when an atheist attacks biblical theism, it is perfectly in order to cite propositions from the Bible to defend the integrity of this belief system. The only exception was where God revealed that He would bring the animals to Noah.
But where Scripture is silent, I have proposed no miraculous means see also discussion in Flood models and biblical realism. JS: Eventually biblioskeptics run out of excuses, as we know from experience. This suggests that the whole exercise was a pseudo-intellectual smokescreen for unbelief that has different underlying causes.
GB November 24th, Compare also his article Problems with a Global Flood? If it no longer exists, what happened to it? JS: Woodmorappe ch. How did Noah and his small family look after so many animals for so long in a boat!
- Jasmine And The Twins Go To The Circus.
- The Raven Prince (Princes Trilogy Book 1)?
- Qutrinol capsules benefits in hindi?
- related stories.
- Navigation menu.
- FACT CHECK: Did U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar Marry Her Brother?.
JS: Did you not read about potstals and grupstals in the comments above reply to S. See also Woodmorappe ch. MS: Why did God get Noah to go to all this trouble? JS: Clearly Noah was willing, so how is this any of your concern? Here was I thinking that you had scientific objections, whereas here is a pseudo-theological one! See Woodmorappe p. MS: Most animals require very precise habitats that can take very many years to create.
How could these have been created so soon after the flood, and who put these millions of animals back into their correct habitats, if they existed? JS: No, most animals are very adaptable, as shown by zoos that keep animals from a wide variety of habitats. MS: How many deaths and casualties were there among these millions of creatures couped-up for so long?
JS: As pointed out in my previous response to you, only about 16, obligate passengers on the Ark, and no recorded deaths. See Woodmorappe ch. MS: Where were all the animals stored that were to become food for the thousands of carnivorous mammals, birds and reptiles?
JS: Dried meats that could be reconstituted with the abundant supply of rainwater.
Scientifically proven ways to lose weight
This decimated the population. The giant tortoises were seen to be an excellent source of fresh meat, as the tortoises could be kept for long periods of time with little food or water. The sailors on the Beagle took 30 on board for this purpose, discarding the shells and bones as they consumed them.
Woodmorappe [ch. See also response to R. MS: And what would the carnivores have eaten once back on dry land? JS: Fish trapped in pools left behind by retreating floodwaters, exhumed carrion that would be in abundant supply. JS: See also Woodmorappe ch. Very few land animals are mainly piscivorous, and they can eat fish substitutes. Some fish aestivate: remain dormant in a cocoon in the mud if their pool dries up.
MS: How many creatures became sea-sick and died during this violent storm? JS: None that we know of, perhaps because the Ark was an extremely stable boat. See Yes, Noah did build an Ark! Tsunamis are barely noticeable in deep water. MS: How rife was disease in the Ark with animals so tightly packed into such a confined space for so long?
JS: Again, see Woodmorappe ch. MS: Was all this carnage the work of a caring and loving God? JS: Yes, since this caring and loving God is also holy and just, so punishes sin. The New Testament treated this as a real event and warning of judgment to come. But it also shows the solution to this dilemma see Good News!
This is the most important thing! GB November 21st, I very much hope you will answer my 5 questions. Most are already answered on our site, which you should have searched as per our feedback rules. MS: 1. You say in your answers that the insects could be kept in boxes 4" square. JS: Indeed, and also that insects were likely not obligate passengers. JS: A very tiny fraction. MS: That equals a line of boxes of around 53 miles long!
Then there are all the other millions of insect species. JS: Where do you get this number from? About ,—1,, of all described species are insects. MS: 2. You also say there was no need to take fish onto the ark. The salinity level of water is absolutely crucial to all fish. Marine fish would all have perished as the salinity dropped, equally fresh-water fish would have perished as the salinity rose, try dropping some salt into your fresh-water aquarium, or filling your marine tank with fresh or brackish water and see what happens.
We can build our cities for e-commerce, we just need to repurpose our parking lots
JS: Try reading the response to Steve M. As the article pointed out, God brought the animals to him. MS: 4. Have you ever tried working with animals in an almost fully enclosed environment? Methane and CO 2 levels rise very quickly as oxygen levels fall and the atmosphere soon becomes stifling. Many creatures would very quickly suffer in such a place. Again, see response to Steve M. MS: 5. Salt is one of the best known weedkillers. After the flood the soil would have remained infertile for up to a year or more until the salt had leached away. Try growing common seeds, and water with a weak saline solution to see what happens.
JS: Ph. As well as doing experiments on seeds germinating after soaking in water, Darwin pointed out that seeds survive in the dead carcasses of birds and animals floating in the sea. Many legume seeds are like this and will withstand prolonged submersion without losing viability. Olives are propagated commercially from cuttings, and have been for thousands of years. CA November 1st, It would take another Ark somehow filled with non-perishable food impossible!
RC: But for the carnivores needing 16 pounds of fresh-killed flesh per day to survive there would have to be vast stores of surplus animals somehow released but prevented from escaping the range of carnivores. JS: Which carnivores did you have in mind? After disembarkation, animals could feed on exhumed carrion and fish trapped in pools left by the retreating Flood water. JS: As should be clear from our site, we have no interest in looking for the Ark today. Jack J. US October 25th, Nice article, but you live in a world of theoretical materials.
Jonathan Sarfati responds: Not at all—the Woodmorappe book is full of applied low-tech methods. More recently, the article How could Noah care for the animals? JJ: What did Noah make the ark out of, for instance? JS: Gopher wood, as the Bible says. JJ: The structural integrity of wood literally would have collapsed upon itself just from weight alone, not to mention human-errors in the construction. JS: A fact-free assertion.
You appear to be unaware of huge wooden vessels of antiquity , as well as many methods of making very strong wood vessels see Yes, Noah did build an Ark!
Actions and Detail Panel
JS: Why would we? They are too weak see The moon: the light that rules the night under Tides. Also, any slot could be reinforced. JJ: And if there is some perfect design that utilizes outside force to make up for internal stresses, where did they get all the wood, and the technical ability to build such a thing? JS: Wood normally comes from trees to my knowledge. JJ: After the flood, how did all the animals get back to their present-day continent? Flying maybe? JS: See answer to David W. Okay, so say that happened.
JJ: The point is, that cavities would form in the crust, and the sheer weight of the water above would crush them, forming huge tidal forces, tsunamis, JS: But as naval engineers showed, the Ark could easily stand up to all that. JS: Indeed, the Flood was a catastrophe. But this would recover quickly—see After devastation … the recovery. JJ: And what about the oxygen? JS: Good ventilation. The long window on the roof of the Ark was similar to that on many factories today.
JJ: Even if you can solve all of these problems and form some cohesive solution, it doesn't mean it happened. JS: The point is to show that was not impossible, so there is no excuse to doubt the eye-witness accounts in Scripture confirmed by Christ Himself. JJ: I will not have fellow humans slander the works of humans. Many atheistic regimes did just that.
JJ: Religion corrupts the world. This was thoroughly documented by Rudolph Rummel b. JS: I know the feeling, believe me. Just look at what I have to deal with ;. US September 30th, JS I am not sure how you could gain such an impression, except by playing bait-and-switch aka the fallacy of equivocation. The free online book chapter Variation and natural selection versus evolution should reduce confusion. TN and yet I never, to my knowledge, encountered a Biblical literalist until college in biology, go figure.
TN And I grew up in Texas in the 70s and 80s thank you very much. I grew up in New Zealand at the same time. Not sure what this proves though. Steve M. CA August 30th, Dr Jonathan Sarfati replies: Your self-confessed emotionalism is clouding your judgment. JS: That must have been a shock to find on a site called creation.
After all, this is one of our explanations for the exponential decay of lifespans after the Flood. SM: A lot of blanks like how were the animals were feed are made up with no facts whatsoever. JS: No facts? Can you disprove the possibility of dried and concentrated foods? The technology has long been known and is not difficult. Other examples of plausible means for animal storage over many months come from the low-tech methods that Dutch farmers have used for centuries to keep animals over the harsh winters: the potstal and the grupstal see How could Noah care for the animals?
How did different skin colours come about?
Scientifically proven ways to lose weight
Are black people the result of a curse on Ham? SM: and how pugs became great danes I got more silly science. JS: That above really is silly science. The real science is that both pugs and great danes came from a common ancestor, a pair of wolves. A great dane is likely the result of concentration of genes for growth already present in the wolf, or maybe some loss of control of growth. The pug is the result of a downhill mutation in genes controlling the growth of snout bones.
SM: The claim evolution is wrong that means it cannot be right when it suits you. See Variation and natural selection versus evolution. SM: So Noah cannot have negroid children and they cannot become negroid because that would be evolving or changing. JS: They would be changing , but not in the direction that would change nematodes into Noah. You notice that we do that, for example addressing the best arguments for evolution from the National Academy of Sciences and Richard Dawkins , and the best arguments for old-earth compromise from Hugh Ross.
JS: I don't recall anywhere where we have claimed it does. A boa is a constrictor, very different from a venomous snake like the cobra. SM: Just like all fresh water fish will die in salt water and massive temperature changes. I saw this for myself many years ago at Underwater World in Queensland, Australia. They had a freshwater and saltwater fish in the same tank, and achieved this by gradual adjustments to salinity in both fish until they could cope with the same salinity.
You also need to be aware of the well-known phenomena of thermoclines and haloclines , persistent temperature and salinity gradients. See also our old friends the search button and Creation Answers Book. Another chapter covers : How did freshwater and saltwater fish survive the Flood? How did saltwater fish survive dilution of the seawater with freshwater, or how did freshwater types survive in saltwater? And how did plants survive?
SM: Filling in the huge amount of blanks like species, races and how things were done without any facts. JS: The facts are abundant, but unfortunately we have no way under present technology to pipe them directly into your brain. Thus all we can do is point out that you need to search for them cf. SM: At least the evolutionist say they have a theory it means they are not certain.
JS: I must admit that it makes a change to hear an evolutionist use this argument. JS: They are. SM: You see doubt and blind faith as heresy. JS: News to me. See for example The Importance of Evidence. SM: The Bible says all sorceress are to be put to death. Will you still follow this law? JS: Please see Is eating shellfish still an abomination?
SM: It seems you follow the answers that fit your narrow minded views. JS: In reality, we, like you, interpret the facts in the light of a paradigm or set of underlying assumptions. See for example Presuppositionalism vs evidentialism and The role of axioms, internal consistency and real world application.
- Not Walking On Water: The Most Improbable Spiritual Enlightening of a Computer Geek; A Novel!
- Chain of Deceit!
- 11 Best Natural DHT Blockers for Men | Hairguard [June ].
SM: Primitive thinking for primates. Mike M. NG August 29th, Gen Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. How high was the water? Jonathan Sarfati August 29th, Even Mt Everest has marine limestone on its summit, showing that it was once buried under water.
Find out more about how your privacy is protected. Jun Actions and Detail Panel Power Women! Event description. Description During this Free Online Masterclass you will discover how to: Permanently lose weight and thrive at a healthy body weight for good! Overcome Chronic Dieting and enjoy a lifetime of guilt-free eating! Read more Read less. Share with friends. Map and Directions View Map. Save This Event Log in or sign up for Eventbrite to save events you're interested in.
Sign Up. Already have an account? Log in. Event Saved. Your message has been sent! Your email will only be seen by the event organizer.